Mr. Gapasin centered on the seemingly absurd info of the allegations, i.e., how she ended up on the O-6 deck without being seen, how she wasn’t heard by a witness who lived in an adjacent stateroom, and how she instantly acquired an expedited transfer from Sasebo to San Diego. Gapasin argued before an Enlisted Panel that merely “assuming” what his client thought or believed was not the hard, strong info needed underneath the legislation to satisfy the high burden of proof of beyond a reasonable doubt. Mr. Gapasin proceeds to trial. Gapasin proceeds to trial and focuses on the “sloppy, rushed administration of travel vouchers” as well because the lack of correct steering by the command and its “one receipt policy” that resulted in numerous mistakes to the financial detriment of the Marines. Gapasin conducts his investigation and learns that both committed false official statements to OSI in order to avoid wasting their own skins. Both give statements to OSI that the client was current and arranged the distribution, but consumer continues to deny collaborating. Not solely did Gapasin expose a number of contradictions and inconsistencies in the two “snitches’” expected testimony, however Gapasin’s overview of the info extraction on the cell telephones didn’t reveal texts from the shopper to the patrons as he was accused of having.
Gapasin cross-examines the Government’s DFAS skilled as well as the primary Sergeant who admits there are a variety of “gray areas” in the journey voucher course of. At trial, Gapasin exposes weaknesses in the Government’s case and its failure to satisfy their high burden of proof. Result: ONE WEEK Before TRIAL, charges against Mr. Gapasin’s client are DISMISSED AND WITHDRAWN. Both are well-known drug customers at Holloman AFB, but the government never even obtained a optimistic urinalysis on Gapasin’s consumer. Gapasin cross-examines further witnesses that the government places on the stand. Gapasin attacked the Government’s case as a result of it solely used statements made by his shopper at the video interrogation, and since it only focused on his LES’s and the increase in entitlements that they declare Gapasin’s client ought to have observed after 16 years of military service. Although the motion was denied, Gapasin reveals numerous flaws in the Government’s case by way of witness testimony and proof admitted during litigation of the movement. He cross-examines the Government’s expert in Defense Finance and Accounting in addition to his client’s estranged, hostile partner. Mr. Gapasin instantly recordsdata a Motion to Dismiss because of Unlawful Command Influence (UCI) and enters into proof a clandestine recording of the first Sergeant taken by one other Marine in his client’s unit.
Lastly, Gapasin introduced the government with its “Alibi” witness, who was expected to testify that Gapasin’s consumer was not even in Alamogordo, NM on the time of the alleged distribution. Gapasin also referred to as the ship’s commander to testify about destructive observations he made from the accusing sailor, to incorporate incidents of malingering, lying to her mom about not receiving proper care on the ship, and expressing feelings of sickness but still taking liberty when the ship arrived at the Philippines. In the event that they nonetheless don’t care, then the Keepers come after them subsequent. To cowl their asses they changed the catalog entries to remove the picture (which is still all over the online) and altered the text to learn that a smartcard is used to unlock the machines (it isn’t, or no less than it is not for the several hundred thousand e-voting machines now in the sector). Webcam. Get one for his laptop computer (I assume he has a laptop computer) and interact such as you usually would – except barefoot throughout.